Skip to main content


After reading The Preludes to Assaults by Jane Eaton Hamilton I was compelled to post this poem on here.

Forget history, culture and knowledge. Break free
of your hoarding of facts, dates. Forget right and wrong.
Nothing means what it intends. The opposite is true
until we recognize it and then it becomes a lie.

The ideologue is the great virus, scourge of this planet.
He climbed down from his tree and turned it
into toilet paper. He tore open his mother’s flesh
to mine for gold.

Hated his kind, moulded it into a sword
made of his mother’s blood and slew his brother.
Sold his children into slavery and called himself
Ruler. Warrior. God.

Gaia is a whore and man is her pimp.
Our laws, our art, our songs, can’t rid her
of this storm, this swarm, this pandemic
this era of man who descended

from the awe and beauty bestowed upon him
by a power he could never deconstruct
this creation larger than his knowing
the stars he couldn’t reach, so instead

he sought revenge and created the order
raping every vessel of hope, each womb
of enlightenment, churned our mother’s milk
into grease, a war to be won.

So when we talk of misogyny as though
it’s simply the fear and hatred of woman
remember – it is the seed of homelessness
entrenched so deeply we blame nature

say it is natural law, say boys will be boys
corner them by two converging walls
of a doctrine so bricked no light can enter
no doubt allowed to breathe

trapped in the construct even she defends
his privilege by love’s failure to disarm
the earth he has littered with weapons
against the distant bird singing at dawn.

published in Eyewear Blink September 2015


Popular posts from this blog

The Ultimate Goal of Patriarchy is the End of Life

I want to clarify the line between men in general and patriarchal values propagated and imposed on human society.

In order for patriarchy to succeed, it had to kill more efficiently than the nine months gestation it took for a woman to give birth.  So the craft of war  became more than simply defending territory. It became the ritualized erasure of our human nature for the rule of centralized power. 

And no, it hasn't succeeded in diminishing the human population on this planet but it has succeeded in sustaining an ideology of what it means to be a man. 

Civilizations built on myths of great conquerors. Histories about the exploits of the greatest killers. Inventions of race, religious ideology and ritual that transformed the teachings of thoughtful prophets into crusades. Endless games of winning and losing.
Men who celebrate life through medicine, science, education, art, philosophy and poetry must be dismissed as soft, shamed as effeminate. 

Men who have been raised with love, love …

Anonymous Sources

Where does "Greatness" come from? The imagination? Facts? Confidence? A willing suspension of disbelief in a slogan that makes us happy? A capacity to judge well? An ability to observe and find solutions that benefit most if not all? Taking responsibility for the community? A masters degree from Oxford or Yale?

Let me offer the opinion that greatness comes from extraordinary effort or talent.  Greatness as it may exist in our anonymous ambitions does not win fame except in isolated circumstances.  That is to say, fame is not a realistic goal for an individual.

Greatness is like a dove in the imagination, an angel, a temporary insight, a fleeting epiphany. Something aspired to in the privacy of our minds.

Greatness was an ambition I held when I was a teen and had no proof that I was good at anything or useful to the world at all. After repeated criticism and dismissal from the community around me where I attempted to win something, anything, like a medal, a competition, or a…

Torturing Youth is Okay with us?

“More than two-thirds of Canadians feel Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made the wrong choice in awarding a $10.5 million settlement to Omar Khadr, according to a new poll by the Angus Reid Institute.” CBC News
But we don’t see the survey questions in this article. How was the poll actually worded? Reading one article might make us believe we are well informed, but how does a single poll actually tell us how people feel?  
“And while the survey shows that a majority of Liberals and New Democrats are opposed to the government's decision, how the numbers compare to previous polling suggests that views on Khadr have hardened over the last decade — and that he remains a divisive figure.”
How can a single poll tell whether Khadr is a divisive figure or not? What information do respondents have to make such a claim? 
The article then switches to a former US special force soldier who was blinded in one eye during the 2002 firefight in Afghanistan involving Khadr.  Of course he would be critica…