Saturday, 14 February 2015
Roy Romanow & Ed Broadbent on Bill C-51
"They point out that it gives security agencies too much power to detain suspects without charge. They say it returns Canada to the days when the country’s spies spent much of their time playing dirty tricks against real or imagined threats.
They note that the bill’s definition of what constitutes a threat to national security is so broad that it “could include just about anything.”
Terrorism, they write, is “designed to provoke governments into making drastic mistakes.” Bill C-51, they imply, is one such drastic mistake."
Tom Walkom, Toronto Star: NDP history pushing Thomas Mulcair to oppose anti-terror bill: Walkom
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
You Possess A Rare and Beautiful Gift
No I am not about to get slushy or fill this page with sweet thoughts. I was raised to believe I would never amount to anything. I was onc...
-
9: language - every living creature has some form of communication, a way to warn of danger and a way to welcome. The language we use ...
-
This post is a continuation of the series on the new class system , and bears no relation to the slang usage referring to a part of female ...
-
https://aish.com/what-are-the-ten-commandments/ #:~:text=The%20Ten%20Commandments First Commandment: I am God your Lord (Life that sprung...
Oh, Canada! We are becoming more like the USA every day. In all the liberty-shrinking, hateful ways.
ReplyDeleteYes and I can't believe that the majority of Canadians are okay with this. Polls, schmolls! How do they word them? "Are you for or against terrorism?"
Delete