Saturday, 14 February 2015
Roy Romanow & Ed Broadbent on Bill C-51
"They point out that it gives security agencies too much power to detain suspects without charge. They say it returns Canada to the days when the country’s spies spent much of their time playing dirty tricks against real or imagined threats.
They note that the bill’s definition of what constitutes a threat to national security is so broad that it “could include just about anything.”
Terrorism, they write, is “designed to provoke governments into making drastic mistakes.” Bill C-51, they imply, is one such drastic mistake."
Tom Walkom, Toronto Star: NDP history pushing Thomas Mulcair to oppose anti-terror bill: Walkom
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Begin Again
Each day I wake and worry about where our species are heading. My days are filled with listening to podcasts, radio shows, articles on the h...
-
https://aish.com/what-are-the-ten-commandments/ #:~:text=The%20Ten%20Commandments First Commandment: I am God your Lord (Life that sprung...
-
CBC has a page documenting all the murdered and missing Aboriginal Women since the 1950's . Every decade, apart from the last sees mor...
-
What do you think of when you have money? Is it food or fun or security? Is it something that belongs to someone else which keeps you from...
Oh, Canada! We are becoming more like the USA every day. In all the liberty-shrinking, hateful ways.
ReplyDeleteYes and I can't believe that the majority of Canadians are okay with this. Polls, schmolls! How do they word them? "Are you for or against terrorism?"
Delete