Saturday, 14 February 2015
Roy Romanow & Ed Broadbent on Bill C-51
"They point out that it gives security agencies too much power to detain suspects without charge. They say it returns Canada to the days when the country’s spies spent much of their time playing dirty tricks against real or imagined threats.
They note that the bill’s definition of what constitutes a threat to national security is so broad that it “could include just about anything.”
Terrorism, they write, is “designed to provoke governments into making drastic mistakes.” Bill C-51, they imply, is one such drastic mistake."
Tom Walkom, Toronto Star: NDP history pushing Thomas Mulcair to oppose anti-terror bill: Walkom
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Come my children my friends my teachers - my grieving family and friends
This is not your fault. This is the design of power for power's sake. The design for the exploitation of humanity turning itself into ...
-
9: language - every living creature has some form of communication, a way to warn of danger and a way to welcome. The language we use ...
-
https://aish.com/what-are-the-ten-commandments/ #:~:text=The%20Ten%20Commandments First Commandment: I am God your Lord (Life that sprung...
-
It takes four to ten years to study medicine and the learning never ends—specialists research until they die—spend hours on committees...
Oh, Canada! We are becoming more like the USA every day. In all the liberty-shrinking, hateful ways.
ReplyDeleteYes and I can't believe that the majority of Canadians are okay with this. Polls, schmolls! How do they word them? "Are you for or against terrorism?"
Delete